
\documentclass{slides}

\usepackage{amssymb, amsmath, amscd, color, epsfig}
%\usepackage[matrix,arrow]{xy}

\newcommand{\green}{\color[rgb]{0,0.4,0}}
\newcommand{\purple}{\color[rgb]{0.4,0,0.4}}
\newcommand{\red}{\color[rgb]{0.7,0,0}}
\newcommand{\blue}{\color{blue}}


\def\eqref#1{(\ref{#1})}
\newcommand{\goth}{\mathfrak}
\newcommand{\g}{{\frak g}}
\newcommand{\arrow}{{\:\longrightarrow\:}}
\newcommand{\Z}{{\Bbb Z}}
\newcommand{\C}{{\Bbb C}}
\newcommand{\R}{{\Bbb R}}
\newcommand{\Q}{{\Bbb Q}}
\renewcommand{\H}{{\Bbb H}}
\newcommand{\6}{\partial}
\def\1{\sqrt{-1}\:}
\newcommand{\restrict}[1]{{\left|_{{#1}}\right.}}
\newcommand{\cntrct}                % contraction with a vector field
{\hspace{2pt}\raisebox{1pt}{\text{$\lrcorner$}}\hspace{2pt}}


\def\Bbb#1{\mathbb #1}


\newcommand{\calo}{{\cal O}}
\newcommand{\cac}{{\cal C}}

% Correcting TeX...
%\let\oldtilde=\tilde
%\renewcommand{\tilde}{\widetilde}
\renewcommand{\bar}{\overline}
\renewcommand{\phi}{\varphi}
\renewcommand{\epsilon}{\varepsilon}
\renewcommand{\geq}{\geqslant}
\renewcommand{\leq}{\leqslant}

% Operatornames
\newcommand{\even}{{\rm even}}
\newcommand{\ev}{{\rm even}}
\newcommand{\odd}{{\rm odd}}
\newcommand{\const}{{\it const}}
\newcommand{\fl}{{\rm fl}}
\newcommand{\im}{\operatorname{im}}
\newcommand{\End}{\operatorname{End}}
\newcommand{\Sym}{\operatorname{Sym}}
\newcommand{\St}{\operatorname{St}}
\newcommand{\Hol}{\operatorname{{\cal H}ol}}
\newcommand{\Tot}{\operatorname{Tot}}
\newcommand{\Id}{\operatorname{Id}}
\newcommand{\id}{\operatorname{\text{\sf id}}}
%\newcommand{\Reeb}{\operatorname{\text{\sf Reeb}}}
\newcommand{\Vol}{\operatorname{Vol}}
\newcommand{\Hom}{\operatorname{Hom}}
\newcommand{\Mor}{\operatorname{Mor}}
\newcommand{\Aut}{\operatorname{Aut}}
\newcommand{\Alt}{\operatorname{Alt}}
\newcommand{\Iso}{\operatorname{Iso}}
\newcommand{\Sec}{\operatorname{Sec}}
\newcommand{\Can}{\operatorname{Can}}
\newcommand{\Sing}{\operatorname{Sing}}
\newcommand{\Mass}{\operatorname{Mass}}
\newcommand{\codim}{\operatorname{codim}}
\newcommand{\coim}{\operatorname{coim}}

\newcommand{\coker}{\operatorname{coker}}
\newcommand{\slope}{\operatorname{slope}}
\newcommand{\rk}{\operatorname{rk}}
\newcommand{\Def}{\operatorname{Def}}
\newcommand{\Lie}{\operatorname{Lie}}
\newcommand{\Tw}{\operatorname{Tw}}
\newcommand{\Tr}{\operatorname{Tr}}
\newcommand{\Spec}{\operatorname{Spec}}
\newcommand{\Diff}{\operatorname{Diff}}

\renewcommand{\Re}{\operatorname{Re}}
\renewcommand{\Im}{\operatorname{Im}}



\newcommand{\inbfpare}[1]{{%
  \mbox{\tt (}\hspace{-5pt}\mbox{\tt (} #1 % 
  \mbox{\tt )}\hspace{-5pt}\mbox{\tt )}%
}}
\newcommand{\comment}[1]{{}}

\def\blacksquare{\hbox{\vrule width 10pt height 10pt depth 0pt}}
\def\endproof{\blacksquare}
\def\shortdash{\mbox{\vrule width 4.5pt height 0.55ex depth -0.5ex}}


\makeatletter

%\@ifundefined{Bbb}
%     {\newcommand{\Bbb}[1]{{\mathbb #1}}}%
%{}%     {\edef\Bbb#1{{\Bbb #1}}}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%       Pagestyle                                %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
 
\newcommand{\ps@verbit}{%
  \renewcommand{\@oddhead}{%
          \scriptsize {\it \small LCK manifolds, lecture 7 \hfil
  \tiny M. Verbitsky }}
  \renewcommand{\@evenhead}{\@oddhead}
  \renewcommand{\@oddfoot}{\hfil\thepage\hfil}
  \renewcommand{\@evenfoot}{\@oddfoot}}
 
\pagestyle{verbit}



   \setlength\paperheight {10in}%
    \setlength\paperwidth  {13.5in}
\setlength{\textwidth}{0.8\paperwidth}
\setlength{\textheight}{0.8\paperheight}

 \setlength{\pdfpageheight}{\paperheight}
 \setlength{\pdfpagewidth}{\paperwidth}
\addtolength{\topmargin}{-20mm}
\addtolength{\leftmargin}{-25mm}
\addtolength{\rightmargin}{-25mm}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Lemma, sublemma, corollary, proposition, theorem,             %
% definition,example defined there:                             %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%


\newcommand{\proof}{{\bf \green Proof:\ }}

\newcounter{section}
\newcounter{Mycounter}[section]
\newcounter{lemma}[section]
\setcounter{lemma}{0}
\renewcommand{\thelemma}{\noindent{Lemma \thesection.\arabic{lemma}}}
\newcommand{\lemma}{%
     \setcounter{lemma}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{lemma}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green LEMMA:\ }}

\newcounter{claim}[section]
\setcounter{claim}{0}
\renewcommand{\theclaim}{\noindent{Claim \thesection.\arabic{claim}}}
\newcommand{\claim}{%
     \setcounter{claim}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{claim}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green CLAIM:\ }}

\newcounter{corollary}[section]
\setcounter{corollary}{0}
\renewcommand{\thecorollary}{\noindent{Corollary \thesection.\arabic{corollary}}}
\newcommand{\corollary}{%
     \setcounter{corollary}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{corollary}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green COROLLARY:\ }}

\newcounter{theorem}[section]
\setcounter{theorem}{0}
\renewcommand{\thetheorem}{\noindent{Theorem \thesection.\arabic{theorem}}}
\newcommand{\theorem}{%
     \setcounter{theorem}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{theorem}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green THEOREM:\ }}

\newcounter{conjecture}[section]
\setcounter{conjecture}{0}
\renewcommand{\theconjecture}{\noindent{Conjecture \thesection.\arabic{conjecture}}}
\newcommand{\conjecture}{%
     \setcounter{conjecture}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{conjecture}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green CONJECTURE:\ }}

\newcounter{proposition}[section]
\setcounter{proposition}{0}
\renewcommand{\theproposition}
       {\noindent{Proposition \thesection.\arabic{proposition}}}
\newcommand{\proposition}{%
     \setcounter{proposition}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{proposition}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green PROPOSITION:\ }}

\newcounter{definition}[section]
\setcounter{definition}{0}
\renewcommand{\thedefinition}
       {\noindent{Definition~\thesection.\arabic{definition}}}
\newcommand{\definition}{%
     \setcounter{definition}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{definition}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green DEFINITION:\ }}


\newcounter{example}[section]
\setcounter{example}{0}
\renewcommand{\theexample}{\noindent{Example \thesection.\arabic{example}}}
\newcommand{\example}{%
     \setcounter{example}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{example}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green EXAMPLE:\ }}

\newcounter{remark}[section]
\setcounter{remark}{0}
\renewcommand{\theremark}{\noindent{Remark \thesection.\arabic{remark}}}
\newcommand{\remark}{%
     \setcounter{remark}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{remark}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green REMARK:\ }}

\newcounter{observation}[section]
\setcounter{observation}{0}
\renewcommand{\theobservation}{\noindent{Observation \thesection.\arabic{observation}}}
\newcommand{\observation}{%
     \setcounter{observation}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{observation}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green OBSERVATION:\ }}


\newcounter{exercise}[section]
\setcounter{exercise}{0}
\renewcommand{\theexercise}{\noindent{Exercise \thesection.\arabic{exercise}}}
\newcommand{\exercise}{%
     \setcounter{exercise}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{exercise}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green EXERCISE:\ }}

\newcounter{question}[section]
\setcounter{question}{0}
\renewcommand{\thequestion}{\noindent{Question \thesection.\arabic{question}}}
\newcommand{\question}{%
     \setcounter{question}{\value{Mycounter}}
     \refstepcounter{question}
     \stepcounter{Mycounter}
     {\bf \green QUESTION:\ }}


\begin{document}
\setcounter{page}{1}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{center}
{\Large\bf Locally conformally K\"ahler manifolds \\[15mm]
\small lecture 7: Immersion theorem}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\\[14mm]

{\small Misha Verbitsky } 
\\[20mm]

{\tiny\bf HSE and IUM, Moscow
\\[2mm]  March 31, 2014
}
\end{center}



\newpage

{\bf\blue LCK manifolds (reminder)}


\definition
Let $(M,I, \omega)$ be a Hermitian manifold, $\dim_\C M >1$.
Then $M$ is called {\bf \blue locally conformally K\"ahler}
(LCK) if $d\omega=\omega\wedge\theta$, where $\theta$ is a closed
1-form, called {\bf \blue the Lee form}.

\definition
{\bf \blue A manifold is locally conformally K\"ahler}
iff it admits a K\"ahler form taking values in a positive,
flat vector bundle $L$, called {\bf \blue the weight bundle}.


\definition {\bf \blue Deck transform}, or {\bf \blue monodromy maps}
of a covering $\tilde M \arrow M$ are elements of the group $\Aut_M(\tilde M)$.
{\bf \purple
When $\tilde M$ is a universal cover, one has $\Aut_M(\tilde M)=\pi_1(M)$.}

\definition
{\bf \blue An LCK manifold} is a complex manifold such that
its universal cover $\tilde M$ is equipped with a K\"ahler
form $\tilde \omega$, and the deck transform acts on $\tilde M$ by
K\"ahler homotheties.

\theorem {\bf \red These three definitions are equivalent}.


\newpage

{\bf \blue Conical K\"ahler manifolds (reminder)}

\definition
Let $(X,g)$ be a Riemannian manifold, and $C(X):= X \times \R^{>0}$,
with the metric $t^2 g+ dt^2$, where $t$ is a coordinate on $\R^{>0}$.
Then $C(X)$ is called {\bf \blue Riemannian cone} of $X$.
{\bf \purple Multiplicative group $\R^{>0}$ acts on $C(X)$ by homotheties,
$(m, t) \arrow (m, \lambda t)$.}

\definition
Let $(X,g)$ be a Riemannian manifold,
$C(X):= X \times \R^{>0}$ its Riemannian cone, and $h_\lambda$
the homothety action. Assume that $(X,g)$ is equipped with
a complex structure, in such a way that $g$ is K\"ahler,
and $h_\lambda$ acts holomorphically. Then $C(X)$
is called {\bf \blue a conical K\"ahler manifold}.
In this situation, $X$ is called {\bf \blue Sasakian
  manifold}.

\remark A {\bf \blue contact manifold} is defined
as a manifold $X$ with symplectic structure on $C(X)$, and
$h_\lambda$ acting by homotheties. In particular,
{\bf \purple Sasakian manifolds are contact}.
{\bf \green Sasakian geometry is an odd-dimensional
counterpart to K\"ahler geometry}

\example Let $L$ be a positive holomorphic line bundle
on a projective manifold. {\bf \purple Then the total
space of its unit $S^1$-fibration is Sasakian.}

\newpage

{\bf \blue Reeb field (reminder)}
\newcommand{\Reeb}{\operatorname{\sf Reeb}}

\definition {\bf \blue A Sasakian manifold} is a contact manifold $S$ with
a Riemannian structure, such that the symplectic cone
$C(S)$ with its Riemannian metric is K\"ahler.

\definition
Let $S$ be a Sasakian manifold, $\omega$ the K\"ahler form
on $C(S)$, and $r=t\frac{d}{dt}$ the homothety vector field.
Then $\Lie_{Ir}t= \langle dt, Ir\rangle=0$, hence $iR$
is tangent to $S\subset C(S)$. This vector field 
(denoted by $\Reeb$) is called 
{\bf \blue the Reeb field} of a Sasakian manifold.

\remark {\bf \purple The Reeb field is dual to the contact 
form} $\theta=\omega\cntrct r$.

\theorem {\bf \red The Reeb field acts on a Sasakian manifold
by contact isometries.} 


\definition
A Sasakian manifold is called {\bf \blue regular} if the
Reeb field generates a free action of $S^1$, {\bf \blue
  quasiregular} if all orbits of $\Reeb$ are closed, and
{\bf \blue irregular} otherwise.


\newpage

{\bf \blue Vaisman manifolds (reminder)}

\example For any given $\lambda\in \R^{>1}$, {\bf \purple the quotient
$C(X)/h_\lambda$ of a conical K\"ahler manifold is locally
conformally K\"ahler.}

\definition
An LCK manifold $(M, g, \omega, \theta)$ is called
{\bf \blue Vaisman} if $\nabla\theta=0$, where
$\nabla$ is the Levi-Civita connection associated
with $g$.

\theorem Let $M$ be a Vaisman manifold, $\tilde M$ its 
covering; the pullback of the Lee form $\theta$ to $\tilde M$ 
is denoted by the same letter $\theta$. Assume that
$d\psi=\theta$ on $\tilde M$ (such $\psi$ exists, for
example, if $\tilde M$ is a universal cover of $M$). 
Consider the form $\tilde\omega:=e^{-\psi}\omega$.
{\bf \red Then $(\tilde M, \tilde \omega)$ is a K\"ahler manifold,
isometric to a cone.}

\theorem
{\bf \red Every Vaisman manifold is 
obtained as $C(X)/\Z$,} where $X$ is Sasakian, 
$\Z= \bigg\langle (x, t) \mapsto (\phi(x), q t)\bigg\rangle$, $q>1$,
and $\phi$ is a Sasakian automorphism of $X$.
Moreover, the triple $(X, \phi, q)$ is unique.

\newpage

{\bf\blue K\"ahler potentials and plurisubharmonic
  functions (reminder)}

\definition
A real-valued smooth function on a complex manifold
is called {\bf\blue plurisubharmonic (psh)} if the (1,1)-form $dd^c f$
is positive, and {\bf\blue strictly plurisubharmonic} if $dd^c f$
is an Hermitian form.

\remark
Since $dd^c f$ is always closed, {\bf \purple it is also K\"ahler when
it is strictly positive.}

\definition
Let $(M,I,\omega)$ be a K\"ahler manifold.
{\bf \blue K\"ahler potential} is a function $f$
such that $dd^c f=\omega$.

\theorem
Let $S$ be a Sasakian manifold, $C(S)=S \times \R^{>0}$ its cone,
$t$ the coordinate along the second variable, and 
$r=t\frac{d}{dt}$. {\bf \red Then
$t^2$ is a K\"ahler potential on $C(S)$. Moreover,
the form $dd^c \log t$
vanishes on $\langle r, I(r)\rangle$ and the rest of its
eigenvalues are positive.}

\newpage

{\bf\blue The fundamental foliation (reminder)}

\definition
Let $M$ be a Vaisman manifold, $\theta^\sharp$ its Lee field,
and $\Sigma$ a 2-dimensional real foliation generated by
$\theta^\sharp, I\theta^\sharp$. It is called {\bf \blue
  the fundamental foliation} of $M$. Clearly, $\Sigma$
is tangent to orbits of the one-parametric group of
automorphisms of the covering $\tilde M$ generated 
by homotheties. Therefore, {\bf \purple $\Sigma$ 
is a holomorphic foliaton.}

\theorem
Let $M$ be a compact Vaisman manifold, and 
$\Sigma\subset TM$ its fundamental foliation. Then\\
{\bf \red \hphantom{a}\ \ 1. $\Sigma$ is
independent from the choice of the Vaisman metric.\\
\hphantom{a}\ \ 2. There exists a positive, exact
(1,1)-form $\omega_0$ with $\Sigma=\ker \omega_0$.\\
\hphantom{a}\ \ 3. For any complex subvariety
$Z\subset M$, $Z$ is tangent to $\Sigma$. \\
\hphantom{a}\ \ 4. For any compact complex subvariety
$Z\subset M$, the set of smooth points of $Z$ is Vaisman.}

\definition
A Vaisman manifold $M$ is called {\bf\blue regular}, if
the leaves of the fundamental foliation are orbits of
the group $(S^1)^2$ freely acting on $M$, {\bf \blue
  quasiregular} if these leaves are compact, and
{\bf \blue irregular} otherwise.

\newpage

{\bf \blue Orbispaces (reminder)}

\definition
{\bf \blue Groupoid} is a category with all morphisms invertible.

\definition
An action of a group on a manifold is {\bf \blue rigid} if
the set of points with trivial stabilizer is dense.

\definition
{\bf \blue An orbispace} is a topological space $M$, 
equipped with a structure of a groupoid (the points of $M$
are objects of the groupoid category), a covering $\{U_i\}$,
and continuous maps $\phi_i:\; V_i\arrow U_i$, where each
$V_i$ is equipped with a rigid action of a finite group $G_i$,
satisfying the following properties. \\
\hphantom{a}\ \ \ 1. $\phi_i:\; V_i \arrow V_i/G_i=U_i$ is the quotient map.\\
\hphantom{a}\ \ \ 2. For each $x\in M$ and $U_i\ni x$, 
the group $\Mor(x,x)$ is equal to the stabilizer of $x$ in $G_i$.

\remark
An orbispace is a topological space, locally obtained as
a quotient, {\bf \purple with the quotient structure remembered
via the groupoid structure.}

\newpage

{\bf \blue Orbifolds (reminder)}

\definition
{\bf \blue An orbifold} is an orbispace
$(M, \{\phi_i:\; V_i \arrow V_i/G_i=U_i\})$,
where all $V_i$ are diffeomorphic to open balls in $\R^n$.

\example
Let $M=\C P^1/((x,y)\sim(x, -y))$. {\bf \purple This quotient
is homeomorphic to $\C P^1$.} {\bf \red However, it is a different orbifold}
if we consider the covering induced from $\C P^1/G$, $G=\{\pm 1\}$
and the groupoid structure where $\Mor(x,x)=\St_G(x)$.

\definition
{\bf \blue A smooth orbifold} is an orbifold $M$ equipped with
a sheaf of functions $C^\infty M$ in such a way that for each 
$U_i=V_i/G_i$, the corresponding ring of sections
$C^\infty U_i$ is identified with a 
ring of $G_i$-invariant smooth functions on $V_i$.

\definition
{\bf \blue A complex orbifold} is an orbifold $M$ equipped with
a sheaf of functions $\calo_M$ in such a way that each $V_i$
is an open ball in $\C^n$, and for each 
$U_i=V_i/G_i$, the corresponding ring of sections
 $\calo_{U_i}$ is identified with a 
ring of $G_i$-invariant holomorphic functions on $V_i$.


\newpage

{\bf \blue Projective orbifolds (reminder)}

\definition
{\bf \blue An underlying complex variety} of a 
complex orbifold is a complex variety with the topological
space $M$ and the structure sheaf $\calo_M$.

\definition
{\bf \blue A projective orbifold} is a complex
orbifold with the underlying complex variety projective.

\definition
{\bf \blue A holomorphic vector bundle} on a complex orbifold
is a $G_i$-equivariant vector bundle on each $V_i$, equipped
with the $G_i$-invariant gluing maps satisfying cocycle condition.

\theorem {\bf \blue (Baily)}\\
Let $M$ be a compact complex orbifold equipped with 
a holomorphic Hermitian vector bundle $L$. Assume that
the curvature of $L$ is positive definite on all $V_i$
(in this case $L$ is called {\bf \blue positive}). {\bf \red Then
$M$ is projective.}

{\small \it W. L. Baily, \emph{On the imbedding of V-manifolds
    in projective spaces}, Amer. J. Math. {\bf 79} (1957), 403-430.}

\newpage

{\bf \blue Sasakian and Vaisman manifolds and their projective orbifolds}

\theorem
Let $T^n$ be a compact torus acting on a manifold $M$
with all orbits of the same dimension. {\bf \red Then $M/T^n$ is an 
orbifold}.
\endproof


\corollary
Let $M$ be a quasiregilar Vaisman manifold,
$\Sigma$ its fundamental foliation, and $M/\Sigma$
the quotient space. {\bf \red Them $X:=M/\Sigma$ is a projective
orbifold.}

{\bf \green Proof:} Being a $T^2$-quotient, $X$ is an orbifold.
Since it is a quotient of a complex space by a complex group
action, $X$ is a complex orbifold. By construction, the corresponding
conical K\"ahler manifold $\tilde M$ is a total space
of $\C^*$-bundle $L$ (in the orbifold sense).
The standard local argument implies that the
curvature of $L$ gives a K\"ahler orbifold metric on  
$X$. Baily's theorem implies that $X$ is projective.
\endproof

\corollary 
Let $S$ be a quasiregular Sasakian manifold, 
and $\Reeb$ its Reeb field. 
{\bf \red Then $X:=S/\Reeb$ is a projective orbifold, and
$S$ is a total space of $U(1)$-bundle over $X$ associated
with a positive  holomorphic line bundle.}

{\bf \green Proof:} $S\times S^1$ is Vaisman, and the
corresponding fundamental foliation is $TS^1\times \Reeb$.
\endproof

\newpage

{\bf \blue Conical K\"ahler structures and homotheties}

{\bf \green Proposition 1:}
Let $(M,  \omega)$ be a conical K\"ahler manifold,
and $X$ a vector field acting on $M$ by holomorphic, non-isometric 
homotheties, such that $IX$ also acts by homotheties,
and $e^{t X}$ is defined for any real $t$. Then \\
{\bf \red \phantom{a}\ (a) $dd^c \phi=  \omega$, where $\phi=|X|^2$.\\
\phantom{a}\ (b) Let $S_X:= \phi^{-1}(1)$. Then $S_X$ is Sasakian, \\and
$M$ is isometric to $C(S_X)$.\\
\phantom{a}\ (c) $S_X$ is quasiregular if and only if the action of $X$
integrates to a holomorphic $\C^*$-action.}

{\bf \green Proof. Step 1:} Since $X$, $IX$ act by homotheties, one has
a character $\chi:\; \langle X, IX\rangle\arrow \R$
such that $\Lie_Z\omega=\chi(Z)\omega$. {\bf \purple Replacing $X$ by
some linear combination of $X, IX$ if necessary, we 
may assume that $IX$ acts by isometries. }
Rescaling, we may assume that $\Lie_X g=2g$.

{\bf \green Step 2:} Define $X^\flat:= g(X, \cdot)$ {\bf \blue (``the dual 
1-form'').} Then $dX^\flat= \Lie_{IX}\omega=0$ and
$2 X^\flat = \Lie_X(X^\flat)=d\langle X, X^\flat\rangle=d|X|^2$.

{\bf \green Step 3:} $\Lie_X \omega= 2\omega$, which gives
$2\omega = d(\omega\cntrct X)= d(IX^\flat)= 2 dId|x|^2$
(last equation is proven in Step 2). {\bf \purple This proves
Proposition 1 (a).}

\newpage

{\bf \blue Conical K\"ahler structures and homotheties (cont.)}


{\bf \green Proposition 1:}
Let $(M,  \omega)$ be a conical K\"ahler manifold,
and $X$ a vector field acting on $M$ by holomorphic, non-isometric 
homotheties, such that $IX$ also acts by homotheties,
and $e^{t X}$ is defined for any real $t$. Then \\
{\bf \red \phantom{a}\ (a) $dd^c \phi=  \omega$, where $\phi=|X|^2$.\\
\phantom{a}\ (b) Let $S_X:= \phi^{-1}(1)$. Then $S_X$ is Sasakian, \\and
$M$ is isometric to $C(S_X)$.\\
\phantom{a}\ (c) $S_X$ is quasiregular if and only if the action of $X$
integrates to a holomorphic $\C^*$-action.}


{\bf \green Step 4:} Let $M\arrow S_X$ map $m$ to an intersection
of $e^{tX}m$ and $S_X$. {\bf \purple
This gives a decomposition $M=S_X \times \R^{>0}$,
compatible with the conical metric on $S_X \times \R^{>0}=C(S_X)$,}
as shown in the last lecture using the  local decomposition
of Vaisman manifolds into a product of a Sasakian manifold and
$\R$.

{\bf \green Step 5:} 
Let $C$ be the group generated by 
$e^{tX}, e^{tIX}$. Clearly, $C=\R^{>0}\times \{e^{tIX}\}$.
The Reeb orbits on $S_X$  
are orbits of $e^{tIX}$, {\bf \purple hence they are compact if and
only if $\{e^{tIX}\}$ is compact, equivalently,
iff $C=\C^*$.}
\endproof


\newpage

{\bf \blue Conical K\"ahler structures and $\C^*$-action}

\remark
For each holomorphic isometry $h$ of a Vaisman manifold,
$h$ lifts to a conformal automorphism of its K\"ahler
covering. However, {\bf \purple a conformal automorphism of a K\"ahler
manifold is a homothety,} because $d(f\omega) =df \wedge \omega$,
and this may vanish only when $df=0$.

{\bf \green Theorem 1:}
Let $C(S)$ be a conical K\"ahler manifold, $h_t$
the corresponding homothety action, and $X$ its vector field.
{\bf \red Then there exists a vector field $X_1$ arbitrarily close to $X$}
acting on $C(S)$ by holomorphic homotheties, with $I(X_1)$
also acting by homotheties, {\bf \red such that the action of $X_1$ integrates
to $\C^*$-action on $C(S)$. }

{\bf \green Proof:} Fix some $\lambda>1$, and let $M:= C(S)/h_\lambda$
be the corresponding Vaisman manifold, where $h_t$ acts isometrically.
Consider the Lie group $G\subset \Iso(M)$ 
obtained as the closure of $\{h_t\}$. {\bf \purple For each vector field
$X_1\in \Lie(G)$, $X_1$ acts on $M$ by holomorphic isometries,}
hence it acts on $C(S)$ by homotheties; non-isometrically when
$X_1$ is sufficiently close to $X$. 

Choosing $X'\in \Lie (G)$ rational and sufficiently close
to $X$, we obtain an isometry of $M$ which integrates to a $T^2$-action
on $M$ {\bf \purple 
and to non-isometric $\C^*$-action on its cone. } \endproof

\remark 
By Proposition 1,
{\bf \red his gives a new
cone structure on $C(S)$. }

\newpage

{\bf \blue Density of quasiregular Vaisman manifolds}

\corollary
Let $C(S)$ be a conical K\"ahler manifold,
with $S$ compact. {\bf \purple Then $C(S)$ is holomorphically 
isometric to a total space of non-zero sections 
of a positive line bundle over a 
projective orbifold.}
\endproof

\corollary {\bf \purple Any compact Vaisman manifold $(M,I)$ admits a deformation
$(M,I')$ which is quasi-regular.} Moreover, $I'$ can be chosen
arbitrarily close to $I$. 

{\bf \green Proof:} Take the conical K\"ahler manifold $C(S)$, and
replace the homothety vector field $X$ by a quasiregular one $X'$.
Then take a quotient $C(S)/\Z$ by $\Z$ acting as $e^{\lambda X'}$.
\endproof

\corollary {\bf \purple Any compact
Sasakian manifold $(M,I)$ admits a deformation
$(M,I')$ which is quasi-regular.} Moreover, $I'$ can be chosen
arbitrarily close to $I$. \endproof

\newpage

{\bf \blue Immersion of conical K\"ahler manifolds}

\corollary
Let $C(S)$ be a conical K\"ahler manifold.
{\bf \red Then there exists a holomorphic immersion $C(S)\arrow C(S^{2n-1})$
equivariant under homothety,} with $C(S^{2n-1})=\C^n \backslash 0$
the standard (flat) cone.

\proof
The manifold $C(S)$ is a 
space of non-zero vectors in a total space of a 
positive line bundle $L$ over a projective orbifold 
$X$. By Baily's theorem, $L^N$ is very ample,
and there exists an embedding $X \stackrel j \hookrightarrow \C P^{n-1}$
such that $L^N=l^*(\calo(1))$. Consider a holomorphic map
$\psi_0:\; C(S) \arrow \Tot(L^N)$ mapping $v$ to $v^N$.
It is an $N$-sheeted covering. 

Now, define $\Psi:\; C(S)\arrow C(S^{2n-1})$
as $\Psi(v):= j(\psi_0(v))$. {\bf \purple Since $\psi_0$ is etale
and $j$ an embedding, $\Psi$ is an immersion.}
\endproof

\newpage

{\bf \blue Immersion of Vaisman manifolds}

\definition
{\bf\blue A linear Hopf manifold} is a quotient of
$\C^n \backslash 0$ by a linear automorphism with all
eigenvalues $|\alpha_i|<1$.

\corollary
Let $M$ be a quasiregular Vaisman manifold. {\bf \red Then
$M$ admits an immersion into a linear Hopf manifold.}

\proof 
Let $C(S)$ be a conical K\"ahler covering of $M$.
Consider an immersion $\Psi:\; C(S)\arrow C(S^{2n-1})$,
and let $\gamma:\; \Z \arrow \Aut(C(S))$
be the homothety action. Since $L$ is $\gamma$-equivariant,
$\gamma$ actually induces a linear automorphism $\Gamma$ of a vector space
$\C^n=H^0(L^N)$. Since $\gamma$ uniformly decreases the norm, 
the eigenvalues of $\Gamma$ are all $|\alpha_i|<1$.
This gives a commutative square
\begin{equation*}
\begin{CD}
 C(S) @>{\Psi}>> C(S^{2n-1}) \\
@VV{/\gamma}V  @VV{/\Gamma}V              \\
M@>>>  (\C^{n}\backslash 0)/\langle\Gamma\rangle
\end{CD}
\end{equation*}
with the bottom arrow holomorphic immersion.
\endproof

\remark
In fact, for each Vaisman manifold
{\bf \purple there exists an embedding
into a linear Hopf manifold.}


\newpage

{\bf \blue Kodaira stability theorem}

\theorem {\bf \blue (Kodaira)}
Let ${\cal X} \stackrel\pi\arrow B$ be a smooth,
proper, holomorphic map, and $z\in B$ a point.
Assume that the fiber $X_z:= \pi^{-1}(z)$ is K\"ahler
(that is, admits K\"ahler structure).
{\bf \red Then there exists a neighbourhood
$W\ni z$ such that for each $y\in W$,
the fiber $X_y:= \pi^{-1}(y)$ is K\"ahler.}


{\bf \green Proof. Step 1:} 
Consider the relative Fr\"olicher spectral sequence 
\[ 
R^i\pi_*(\Omega^j_B{\cal X})\Rightarrow R^{i+j}\pi_*(\C_{\cal X})\ \ \ (*)
\]
Here $R^{i+j}\pi_*(\C_{\cal X})$ is the derived pushforward 
of a constant sheaf (that is, a graded local system over $B$ with the fibers
of grading $k$ in $y\in B$ identified with $k$-th cohomology of $X_y$),
and the $E_2$ term $R^i\pi_*(\Omega^j_B{\cal X})$ is 
a coherent sheaf obtained as a derived direct image
of the fiberwise de Rham algebra 
$\Omega^j_B{\cal X}=\Omega^j({\cal X}/B)$.

It is a relative (over $B$) version of the usual
Fr\"olicher spectral sequence 
$H^i(\Omega^j M)\Rightarrow H^{i+j}(M,\C)$.
This spectral sequence gives an inequality
\[
\sum_{i+j=k}\dim H^i(\Omega^jX_y)\geq \sum_{i+j=k}\dim H^i(\Omega^jX_z)
\ \ \  (**)
\]

\newpage

{\bf \blue Kodaira stability theorem (part 2)}



{\bf \green Proof. Step 1:} 
Consider the relative Fr\"olicher spectral sequence 
\[ 
R^i\pi_*(\Omega^j_B{\cal X})\Rightarrow R^{i+j}\pi_*(\C_{\cal X})\ \ \ (*)
\]
This spectral sequence gives an inequality
\[
\sum_{i+j=k}\dim H^i(\Omega^jX_y)\geq \sum_{i+j=k}\dim H^i(\Omega^jX_z)
\ \ \  (**)
\]
Since $X_z$ is K\"ahler, the Fr\"olicher spectral
sequence for $X_z$ degenerates in $E_2$, giving 
$\sum_{i+j=k}\dim H^i(\Omega^jX_z)= h^k(X_z)$.
By semicontinuity, 
\[ \sum_{i+j=k}\dim H^i(\Omega^jX_y)\leq \sum_{i+j=k}\dim H^i(\Omega^jX_z)\]
in a sufficiently small neighbourhood $U$ of $z$.
Comparing this with (**), we find that {\bf \purple rank of
$H^i(\Omega^jX_y)$ is constant in $U$,} hence
the inequality (**) is equality in $U$,
and {\bf \purple the spectral sequence (*) degenerates.}


\newpage

{\bf \blue Kodaira stability theorem (part 3)}



{\bf \green Step 2:}
Consider the sheaf ${\cal H}:=R^1\pi_*(\Omega^1_B{\cal X})$.
It is a coherent sheaf with fiber $H^{1,1}(X_y)$ at each $y\in B$.
From Step 1, we obtain that ${\cal H}$ is locally
free in $U$, and generated by fiberwise closed (1,1)-forms.
Let $\Lambda^{1,1}_{cl}({\cal X}/B)$ be the sheaf
of fiberwise closed vertical forms on ${\cal X}$,
and $\pi_*\Lambda^{1,1}_{cl}({\cal X}/B)\stackrel \Xi\arrow {\cal H}$
the natural projection. Choose a Hermitian metric on ${\cal X}$, 
smoothly extending the K\"ahler metric $\omega_z$ on $X_z$,
and let ${\cal H} \stackrel {\Xi^*}\arrow \pi_*\Lambda^{1,1}_{cl}({\cal X}/B)$
be the Hermitian conjugate map. By construction, $\Xi^*$ is an orthogonal
projection of cohomology to closed (1,1)-forms along exact 2-forms.
Therefore, {\bf \purple $\Xi^*$ maps the K\"ahler class $[\omega_z]$
to its harmonic representative $\omega_z$.}


{\bf \green Step 3:}
Let $\tilde \omega$ be a smooth section of ${\cal H}$
satisfying $\tilde\omega\restrict z=[\omega_z]$.
{\bf \purple Then $\Xi^*(\tilde \omega)$ is a family of
closed forms $\omega_y\in \Lambda^{1,1}_{cl}(X_y)$,
depending smoothly on $y\in B$.}
Since all eigenvalues of $\omega_z$ 
are positive, the same is true for
$\omega_y$ for $y$ sufficiently close to $z$.
However, a closed, positive $(1,1)$-form is K\"ahler.
\endproof

\remark Neither Vaisman manifolds nor LCK manifolds are
stable under small deformations. However, a small deformation
of Vaisman manifolds in LCK. Next lecture I will define
a new class of LCK manifolds, called {\bf \blue
LCK manifolds with potential} which is stable under
small deformations and contains Vaisman manfilds.


\end{document}

